New evidence has emerged, alleging that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry allegedly keep 95% of the donations received from foreign aid intended for the Invictus Games in Nigeria. 

The couple’s recent visit to the African nation, described as a quasi-royal tour, has sparked discussions about their current status and role. Invited by Nigeria’s highest-ranking military official, Christopher Muza, Meghan and Harry spent three days in the country.

During a discussion with host Nana Akua Cohen, Cohen highlighted a crucial and often misunderstood aspect, particularly among the American fan base. 

Cohen claimed that Harry and Meghan have transitioned from being regarded as royals to becoming celebrities. He expressed his observations on the couple’s latest rebranding efforts and criticized Meghan’s involvement in selling jam as part of her new lifestyle project, American Riviera Orchard.

Cohen further stated on GBN America, “They’re grasping for any sort of lost status that they themselves chose to give up back in 2020. Now they’ve taken this opportunity to go on a quasi-royal tour, not representing any nation but themselves, their favorite subject.”

According to information shared by Megan’s microphone X, sourced from Lani of Barbados Information, there are claims that the couple is utilizing their 501 charity status to receive donations for Archewell from foreign aid in the countries they visit. 

The allegation suggests that they retain 95% of these funds, given their association with Archewell in Delaware. This raises questions about their visits to other countries such as Jamaica and Canada, and whether they intend to secure more foreign aid donations. It is speculated that they spend only 5% of the received funds in the donating country.

The existing law that allows charities to be based in Delaware, sponsored by Joe Biden during his tenure as senator, has faced criticism. Some argue that this law facilitates charity organizations evading their fair share of taxes. 

While corporations receive criticism for not paying their fair share, the same scrutiny should be applied to charities as well.

If the intelligence services can substantiate these claims and present them to King Charles III, it may prompt him to take action, such as suspending titles, removing titles, or issuing a press release to deter such practices. 

King Charles III has been informed about multiple infringements and actions that contravene the Sandringham Summit agreement between Prince Harry, Meghan, and the late Queen.

Doubts have been raised regarding the sustainability of the couple’s chosen lifestyle. Harry has expressed discontent about going on tours, whereas Meghan only completed two tours before quitting. 

Some question how many countries would be willing to host them under their desired conditions. While a country might offer security during their visit and arrange access to a private airport, organizing several days of activities for individuals who do not represent official entities becomes questionable.

It remains to be seen how Meghan and Harry will navigate these challenges and whether they can maintain their preferred lifestyle. 

Critics argue that they are relying heavily on calling in favors, even seeking support from the California governor to address a $200 late payment, suggesting that their network of favors might be dwindling.

KINDLY CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATSAPP COMMUNITY FOR FREE, GET THE LATEST ON THE GO HERE